I’m wrong, and no longer bearish on the Shanghai Composite. You can’t stop this force of nature… Still won’t touch it though.
ECB QE, Stronger Dollar, GPIF / BOJ ETF buying – this is setting up to be the year of non-US DM equities. Beggaring thy neighbor, negative sovereign yields, and insane compression of credit spreads have/will cause a generational asset squeeze.
Are valuations too high and fake? Probably… but who cares. We discount by ~ (B * eqrp + rf). rf is negative. eqrp (at least the vol risk premium part) is restrained by central banks.
DAX – Up 17.4% YTD
NIKKEI – Up 7.4% YTD
I suspect Shanghai Composite is about to fall off a cliff though. Also, NFP tomorrow threatens to change the macro landscape / theme. SPX will continue to lag it’s global counterparts.
I’m uncautiously long… but will get cautious if I see an impending risky catalyst. There are no catalysts around… so buy the rallies & buy the dips.
PS – Been really too busy to post. I’m a bit worried that I’m compounding returns into a blowup “0”. Luckily, that hasn’t happened yet. I continue to take unbecoming magnitudes of risk, but will scale back into cruise control soon.
We’re all trained to be overly skeptical. Markets are generally efficient. Everything is priced in. You never get something for nothing.
It’s not surprising that this mentality gets ingrained in us. We live in a culture of economic distrust. Everyone is out to get us. We’re the products being sold on Facebook and Google. Anyone offering us a free CD or squeegeeing is a charlatan. If something looks too good to be true, it must be.
It’s taken me over nine years to recant the skepticism. But I’ve recanted. “Too good to be true” opportunities end up being good and true all the time. There seems to be free money everywhere. That money might be risky. Sometimes, you’re picking up nickles in front of steam rollers. Most of the time, though, you end up picking up fifties in front of baby strollers.
I’m trying a new strategy in 2015 (along with the other strategies I detailed earlier). I plan to pick up (in small size) any “plausible” free money in the markets.
- It must obviously be free money and a no-brainer.
- It should be too good to be true without being a definite scam.
- Estimating the free money must not be more complicated than assessing 3-4 numbers with arithmetic.
- It must be well known free money (ie, it’s not a secret that I’ve discovered by digging into the 10K).
- Any previous market actions don’t matter… nothing is ever priced in.
I don’t think I can wait for S&P 2,100 anymore. Turkeys, Santa, Jeremy Seigel, and indomitable holiday optimism would have us believe that the only way to live is long and strong. But last night, I experienced a most ominous dream.
In my dream, I was at the RentHop offices with my IB terminal open. In the place of our Director of Product, though, sat George Soros. I looked over at his screen and saw him closing all his positions. I quickly copied him. After all, who am I to question the grand master of reflexivity? A few minutes later, the markets toppled and collapsed.
Maybe I had the dream because of the leverage I’m running. Or perhaps it was from the Soros article I read right before I went to bed. Either way, I’ve found that my dreams have been surprisingly prescient (in fact, I dreamt something similar in mid-September).
There are certainly cracks in the system appearing. Fighting has broken out yet again in Ukraine. ISI is portending potential earnings readjustments. More importantly, we’ve pretty much staged a full V-shaped recovery since October.
I think starting early/mid next week, I’ll move deep ITM long options positions into OTM call options (with slightly lower delta). Implied volatility has dropped like a stone since mid-October, so this is a safer way to play potential rallies. I might fund these with 1×2 or 2×3 on the call side.
I’ve decided to cut risk today by around 15% (I still remain very long and very bullish). The general risk reduction applies to my entire portfolio, but I’ve largely undone the extra EUR short that I put on on the 22nd (risk/reward seems lower here + I’m tired of waiting for actual ECB action). This is in light of the decrease in positive “tail risks” that I see. I’m going to target roughly 2 – 3% in daily volatility into the New Year (and will adjust accordingly if vol increases). I’ve also reduced gamma on near-dated options to prevent theta burn.
- Earnings drift – US earnings growth will continue to be a positive going forward. Annually (assuming constant multiples), that means roughly ~4-5% of nominal appreciation.
- Global QE flow-through – Implementation of QE & balance-sheet expansion actually matters (not just the announcement). This will cause a constant pressure up in the next year or so.
- Continued buybacks & corporate action – This will serve to lower the “duration” of stocks (if we think about stocks as a CF stream). Perhaps it also means less sensitivity to rates and implied risk premium.
- Seasonal effects – Everyone loves turkeys and Santa.
- Short-term cheap oil – In the near-term (and through the holidays), the cheaper oil should have a non-trivial effect on spending. Perhaps it’ll be a retail bonanza this year.
- Low interest rates forever – At this point, I’m solidly in the “global deflation export” camp. We’re going to be getting cheap capital from around the world in perpetuity. Sadly, it’s up to us to carry the world.
- China “Harder Landing” than expected – Market news has been remarkably quiet about China in recent months. Everyone seemed to shrug off the weaker GDP and PMI numbers. So far, the PBOC & the Chinese government have the situation under control. But I’m a bit worried about this one… quite worried.
- Bazookas fired & bullets expended – For now, it appears that the Central Banks of the world have run out of bullets to fire. We’re still anticipating some “great action” by the ECB but that might be a story for next year. Until then, though, everyone is in wait-and-see mode. The PBOC still has bazookas to fire, but will likely only use it if some drastic event happens.
- Perceived “bubbles” & extended multiples – I don’t believe the S&P is overvalued. In fact, with certain assumptions, we might even be undervalued (See this old gem by Damodawan). However, given the 5-year bull market, we’re seeing stronger calls by bears. The fear is there, and will potentially result in repricing of risk. However, this is not the global top (if a top at all).
- Eurozone In-action (but more bucket kicking) – I have little hope of any real change in Europe until shit really hits the fan. Their system is in more gridlock than Republicans & Democrats. More indecision there (coupled with any more negative growth news) will add negative pressure.
- Sustained low oil prices – I don’t actually expect this to happen. But a lot of “bad things” can happen if oil prices remain too low for too long. Sure, we’ll have positive flow-through to the US consumer, but we’ll also damage one of the main growth sectors in our economy. Perhaps more worrying, I foresee massive tail-risks from the collapse / weakening of oil-dependent nation (particularly Russia & Venezuela).
- “Stronger” dollar – will be bad for multi-nationals. But might lower input prices for some.
- Draghi’s jawboning – I don’t know how much longer he can jawbone markets without actual significant intervention. He’s promised a lot, and we’ve priced in a lot. Plus there appears to be some real drama at the ECB.
- More US QE – It’s possible, but only if we double dip or the recovery stalls. However, we shouldn’t expect more QE into growth. Again, Yellen Straddle (no longer Put).
- Ebola “Hype” Recognized – The scare is over. Ebola was never a “real” threat to the US. But judging from the impact, you’d have thought 9/11 happened again (airline stocks dropped ~30% in September / October!).
- Japan seems to be executing the ultimate Hail Mary. They’ve decided to sac the Yen in a last-ditch effort to bolster the economy. I have my doubts, though, given lingering structural issues. One positive, however, is that pension rule changes will likely add a massive tailwind to global equities (mostly the US). Will also cause continued pressure on JPY.
Now that the most recent “correction” is over, I’ve decided to reassess many of the strategies / themes I’ve followed. I’ve decided on the following:
Neutral Rates – Europe and China will be exporting capital / deflation. US, however, will be strong. We might see the end of QE, but the path of rate increases will be slow.
Yellen Straddle – Taper be damned… It’s pretty clear that the central banks of the world are here to jawbone (or, in extreme cases action) stability. Not just economic stability, mind you, but also asset stability. The Yellens, Draghis, and Zhous will be replicating a short-straddle position accordingly.
Some people have been talking about the “Last Great Bubble” (belief in the Central Banks). Perhaps it’s true, but it’s not something to worry about in the short-term. Globally, the political willpower is there to bolster the economies of the world. The bubble will only burst when we receive a negative shock so large that we don’t have the political willpower to act.
Long Beta – We are in an era of low volatility (aside from potential spikes) and moderate earnings growth. Multiples will likely stay inflated for some time, making slightly levered beta a decent Sharpe proposition.
Long Activism – We continue to have cheap debt and share buy backs. The activists have become more vocal and powerful over the last year. I bet along with them.
Long IQ – Where would the best and brightest of Harvard, MIT, etc. go? Software AI are highly levered, and the returns on raw intelligence will be high for the next decade. I don’t believe the intelligence premium is recognized properly (I might have to test this at some point using scraped LinkedIn data).
Short Rates – Given negative carry, I don’t believe following the Goldman strategy is the way to go – especially since the world around us is slowing down. The risk/reward just isn’t there.
Long Growth – The easy money has been made in growth. Earnings growth will be more consistent/stabilized. The long growth names might be more priced to perfection at this point than we believe (ex: NFLX, AMZN). I don’t have a sense of where they should be valued at this point, so I will stay away.
Current portfolio positioning (ratios based off of my ES Delta). Yes, I got mildly spanked by AMZN post-close.
I’ve read numerous articles attempting to use the VIX (or a normalized VIX) as an indicator of market bottoms. In fact, CNN introduces it as the first factor in their “Fear and Greed” index. But instead of forecasting and prediction, perhaps we should be looking at it in a different way…
More risk should be compensated by more reward. VIX (which is constructed using the near and next-term options) does a fairly decent job of predicting forward volatility (top right). However, we don’t see a similar pattern in returns (especially in the 18-25 buckets). In fact, the forward returns drop in the 18-25 bucket. This is the case even when removing the 2008 financial crisis from the data set.
1) When things get bad and uncertain, they’re liable to get more bad and uncertain (dumping positions is a valid play).
2) Market participants (in general) are more long than short. Given some level of leverage, higher volatility -> higher required portfolio margin -> more selling. By the time we get to > 25 (~1.6% moves / day), all the speculators have already been shaken out (hence, why the risk/reward normalizes).
3) I’m fooled by randomness (especially given the market crashes in the last decade) and the risk/return is actually consistent across vol buckets.
4) I’m fooled by bad math and faulty statistics.
* Includes ~ 14 years of data, starting in 1/1/1990 (the back-filled VIX data).
* I haven’t looked at it 2nd order (ie, changes in VIX), but something I want to explore.